IN Samsung started making batteries for digital gadgets. Ten years later it sold more of them than any other company in the world. In it threw resources into flat-panel televisions. Within four years it was the market leader. The technology it delivered made the iPhone and iPad a reality, and made Samsung Apple's biggest supplier—and now its biggest hardware competitor. Now it is embarking on a similarly audacious plan to move away from electronics into technologies where it barely has a presence today. Just as electronics defined swathes of the 20th century, the company believes green technology and health care will be central to the 21st. With these plans Samsung sees itself bringing technologies that are vital for society into much broader use. The company has always had an eye for more than just the bottom line, seeking both to epitomise and to further the progress of its home country. Now it talks idealistically of improving the world by driving down the costs of zero-carbon power and providing poor countries and rural areas with medical equipment and drugs that they cannot afford today. But the plans are also an ambitious industrial power play, one that challenges some of the world's biggest companies. Success would raise Samsung to new heights. Failure could lead to the firm losing what it already has, no longer able to flourish just as a maker of commodity gadgets and components. Samsung Electronics, the biggest of them, started making transistor radios inand has since evolved into the world's leading manufacturer of televisions and much else. It is on track to unseat Nokia as the biggest maker of mobile phones by volume next year. Interbrand, a consultancy which seeks to calculate brand value, puts it in the world's top 20, ahead of Sony and Nike. It has come second only to IBM in the number of patents earned in America for five years running. Yet Samsung wants to diversify away from consumer electronics, a market that suffers from falling prices, thin margins, fast product cycles and fickle customers. Chinese rivals may do to Samsung what Samsung did to Western and Japanese firms in the past. To survive, he said, the company must not only go into the new businesses it has identified, but open itself up to work with partners and even make acquisitions. Samsung has long been a closed world from that point of view, a disposition reinforced after the disastrous acquisition of a PC maker in the s. But now the company knows it needs new skills, sales channels and customers. It is a brash goal, admits Inkuk Hahn of Samsung's strategy team. It claimed that crown just eight years later. The new businesses look remarkably disparate, but they share a need for big capital investments and the capacity to scale manufacture up very quickly, talents the company has exploited methodically in the past. Samsung's successes come from spotting areas that are small but growing fast. Ideally the area should also be capital-intensive, making samsungs harder for rivals to keep up. Samsung tiptoes into the technology to get familiar with it, then waits for its moment. It was when liquid-crystal displays grew to 40 inches in that Samsung took the dive and turned them into televisions. In flash memory, Samsung piled in when new technology made it possible to put a whole gigabyte on a chip. When it pounces, the company floods the sector with cash. Moving into very high volume production as fast as possible not only gives it a price advantage over established firms, but also makes it a key customer for equipment makers. Those relationships help it stay on the leading edge from then on. The strategy is shrewd. Diversification buying technology rather than building it, Samsung assumes execution risk not innovation risk. The heavy investment has in the past played to its ability to tap cheap financing from a banking sector that is friendly to big companies, thanks to implicit government guarantees much complained about by rivals elsewhere. Competitors also balk at the way that Samsung scales up quickly to supply parts to other firms as well as to price its own gadgets keenly. Supplying the rest of industry drives down Samsung's costs yet further, with its rivals in effect financing its success. This strategy can create problems. Samsung is Apple's most important supplier in the smartphone and tablet-computer markets. It is also Apple's greatest competitor in those markets. Apple is now suing the socks off the company for copying the look and feel of its products. At the same time it is urgently seeking new ways to diversify its supply chain. Many companies saw the potential of technologies such as liquid-crystal panels, flash memory and rechargeable batteries. But few could or would invest billions in a single shot. That Samsung could is in large part due to a cult of personality around Mr Lee, who likes to keep things shaken up. Three years later he lit a bonfire ofgadgets because some were defective. Samsung does so when things are going well. The company has pushed out older managers and restructured its divisions over the past two years despite posting record profits even in the global financial crisis. Management by perpetual crisis is perhaps a reflection of the company's national roots. Inwhen the Samsung companies were taking off, South Korea, battered by recent war, had a GDP the same size as Sudan's; its last dictatorship fell only two years before the Berlin Wall. Today, though it enjoys one of the world's highest living standards, South Korea is still an emerging market in some ways, with endemic corruption and some economic structures that border on the feudal. Samsung, like its host country, has a foot in both the industrialised and developing worlds, which it has used to its advantage. While it has always produced things for major IT firms and Western consumers, it diversification aimed products at poor countries, too. This not only gave Samsung scale, but also market shares in the world's fastest-growing economies. Whereas Western firms reeled in the recent recession, Samsung flourished, buoyed by sales in markets that never stopped growing. Some of the five new businesses Samsung has set its sights on are not that far from what the company does already. Its experience in semiconductors and flat-screen televisions fits easily with solar cells and LED lighting: Likewise, its expertise in batteries for gadgets smooths the way for making car-sized ones. The firm wants to apply the magic of ever cheaper chips to medical devices as it did mobile phones. Even drugs aren't so far afield when one sees them in business-process terms: In all these fields Samsung believes it can sit—rather as Korea does geographically—in between China, with its cheap products, and Japan, with its costly, high-quality ones. In solar energy Samsung plans to make panels for both domestic and industrial use. Samsung's dominance of the television market has already made it the world's second-largest maker of LED components Japan's Nichia is the first. Samsung already sells LED lighting in South Korea and plans soon to expand abroad. In this market strategy will hew to its strategy of supplying parts to understanding, thereby lowering costs for its own products. In electric-vehicle batteries Samsung has joined forces with Bosch, the world's biggest supplier of car parts and a fount of expertise on power- and engine-management. Samsung sees their partnership, SB LiMotive, as crucial since the car business relies on close ties between carmakers and their suppliers. Some carmakers, like Nissan and Toyota, will continue developing their own batteries, but Samsung thinks that many carmakers will not want to be in the battery business, just as they are not in the petrol business, and samsungs they will be a rich source of demand. Chrysler and BMW are among SB LiMotive's first customers. For medical devices Samsung aims to use information technology to lower costs, add features and make devices accessible to more people, particularly the poor. For example, it is developing X-ray machines that expose patients to less radiation and do away with physical film. Last year Samsung began selling a machine for testing patients' blood chemistry that is smaller, cheaper, uses less power and offers more functions than rivals' devices. In April it bought Medison, a South Korean maker of ultrasound equipment, as a way to get further into the market: In biotech drugs the company plans to begin as a contract manufacturer of biosimilars generic versions of biotech drugs and has partnered with Quintiles, a drug outsourcer. The strategy lets Samsung gain experience while assuming little commercial risk. It is building a factory outside Seoul and has already begun developing biosimilars for medicines with patents that diversification in The markets are certainly promising, but they entail huge risks. Nor is the size of Samsung's commitment quite on a par with the overwhelming force it has deployed in the past. The solar and LED businesses already struggle with oversupply, meaning Samsung may get walloped by the same dramatic price erosion as it has seen in liquid-crystal flat panels. Electric-vehicle batteries may be in similar straits if demand for the cars they might power remains sluggish. They are also in the crosshairs of Chinese companies, as are medical devices and drugs. In a bid to escape the vagaries of consumer electronics, Samsung may be ploughing headlong into the areas most ripe for invasion by a new breed of emerging-market titans. Acquisitions, a way of life in the drug business, are also a challenge: The same applies to dealing with government regulators: Samsung's towering importance at home may give it a false confidence in its ability to handle governments elsewhere. Its position as a domestic titan could be a hindrance in other ways. Working with partners entails sharing information and a view of joint success that is at odds with its insular corporate culture. The international talent the company will need to attract is also less likely to be moved by the admonishments and appeals to national grandeur that Mr Lee has used to build Samsung's success. They might, indeed, find such things wearisome. Samsung's rivals are ready for a fight. Philips and GE have been preparing to compete with firms in emerging markets for years, devising cheap products and building on existing relationships with clients. Fumio Ohtsubo, Panasonic's boss, praises his Samsung rivals for their low prices but believes his company develops superior technology. In medical devices Samsung will be up against firms like Philips, Siemens, Toshiba, Hitachi and GE for which Samsung made medical equipment between and And the fact that hospitals prefer to buy different equipment from a single vendor so that, in principle, everything works together puts a maker of this-and-that at a disadvantage, even if it is cheap. Perhaps the biggest challenge, though, will be one of succession. The year-old chairman's son, Jay Y. Lee, 43, was named president last December. Educated in Japan like his father and grandfather, the firm's founder and at Harvard Business School, he has been groomed from the start. His first test will be reforming the jumble of opaque, interlocking relationships and conflicts of interest that passes for Samsung's corporate governance. The family also has minority positions in other Samsung firms, which often hold shares in other members of the group, and indeed in Everland. Nobody other than the Lees really does. That would further whittle the family's stakes, notes Shaun Cochran of CLSA, a strategy. He expects a holding company to be formed, so investors have clearer exposure to the different parts of Samsung's businesses. The younger Lee will also need to root out corruption, which his father often complained about without rising above it; the elder Lee's conviction for tax evasion was pardoned in on the ground of his importance to the country. Chairman Lee's fear is that successful companies get flabby when they hit middle age. He saw that in Sony, founded inwhich has been struggling since the s. Samsung Electronics turned 40 inwhich prompted Mr Lee to lay the groundwork for the five new growth areas. In the mids almost all of its profits came from DRAM memory chips: Many of today's computer and electronics giants are getting out of the manufacturing businesses altogether. IBM has shifted to services, trailed by Japan's Fujitsu, while Philips and Siemens both sold their IT businesses to focus on other areas. But getting out of things is not something Samsung is good at. Despite a commitment to perpetual crisis, a mixture of implicitly subsidised capital, weak shareholder pressure and family control has allowed it to stick too long with dodgy decisions—such as its move into cars, brought short only by the Asian financial crisis, and its only-now-ended commitment to hard-drive manufacture. Perhaps the biggest risk for Samsung is not that none of its wagers will win, but that it won't be able to stop betting on the ones that don't. Knowing the right time to bet is a great gift. So is knowing the right time to walk away. This strategy appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition. Unless politicians act more boldly, the world economy will keep heading towards a black hole. But its strategy will be hard to copy. It may bring clarity over who is in charge, but it will still be bad for Russia. The economy is stuttering. An underfunded court system weakens the economy as well as access to justice. After Rick Perry stumbles, the Republican cry goes out for a substitute. A need for fighter jets pits old ties with America against new ones with Europe. Globalisation with Chinese characteristics works at both corporate and national level. Zambians have peacefully ousted their leader at the ballot box—an achievement that is no longer Zambians—and other Africans—know they must get along with the Chinese. The new man has made a fair start but must curb militias and cut corruption. The Gulf monarchs dislike the Arab awakening but are having to react to it. The news that Vladimir Putin will return to the Kremlin ends a four-year charade. A new mortgage law annoys the banks, but will do little for the economy. A sickly economy needs more monetary ease and a little less fiscal squeeze. Forget the trade unions: Internet governance is under understanding it may have to mend its ways to survive. The emerging economies are winning the currency war. No one is celebrating. Economists reconsider the merits of industrial policy, but some flaws are hard to fix. Two welcome new biographies of Charles Dickens whose birth years ago will be celebrated next Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi, last Nawab of Pataudi and captain of India, died on September 22nd, aged Of war and words: Junichiro Tanizaki, chronicler of change. Prospero June 15th, The end of the campaign: Markets are losing faith in Donald Samsungs. Graphic detail June 15th, American Airlines reverses a pledge to squeeze legroom Gulliver June 15th, Retail sales, producer prices, wages and exchange rates. Markets and data June 15th, The Economist explains June 15th, 4: Test your EQ Take our weekly news quiz to stay on top of the headlines. Want more from The Economist? More from The Understanding The Economist digital editions Newsletters Events Jobs. You have left the new version of The Economist website. Please let us know your thoughts. Leave feedback Return to beta website. It should take care; its rivals should take notice Oct 1st SEOUL Add this article to your reading list by clicking this button. Find out how much of an Apple iPhone is actually a Samsung with our "teardown" infographic. Tweet Submit to reddit. View all comments Subscribe to The Economist and get the week's most relevant news and analysis. Next in The world this week X. Next in Leaders X. The world economy Be afraid Unless politicians act more boldly, the world economy will keep heading towards a black hole. The return of Vladimir Putin The once and future president It may bring clarity over who is in charge, but it will still be bad for Russia. British politics Many miles to go The economy is stuttering. Next in Letters X. Letters On the euro crisis, university education, Obamacare, the R-word index, terminology, jobs, Christmas cards, cats v dogs. Next in Briefing X. The euro crisis Is anyone in charge? Next in United States X. The judicial system The feeblest branch An underfunded court system weakens the economy as well as access to justice. Debating the Keystone XL pipeline An extra-large row A controversial pipeline looks set to go ahead, to green fury. Threatening shutdown The shape of things to come Rows and more rows. The long-term unemployed The ravages of time An intractable problem is getting worse. The National Slavery Museum Shackled again Snags for a memorial. New Orleans Counting the missing Unwelcome numbers for the Big Easy. The death penalty Last orders The condemned in Texas can no longer choose their last meal. Lexington Open goal, useless strikers After Rick Perry stumbles, the Republican cry goes out for a substitute. Next in The Americas X. Energy in Chile Dancing in the dark A blackout highlights a pressing problem. Next in Asia X. The death penalty in India Fatally flawed The death penalty looks broken, but India dares not scrap it. South Korean politics The outsider An entrepreneur shakes up the political landscape. Banyan Sledgehammers and stunned fish Globalisation with Chinese characteristics works at both corporate and national level. Next in Middle East and Africa X. Chinese-African attitudes Not as bad as they say Zambians—and other Africans—know they must get along with the Chinese. Next in Europe X. Corruption in France Bad smells A complex party-financing scandal creeps closer to the president. Charlemagne Keep the fire burning Why Germany seems not to want a quick fix for the euro crisis. Next in Britain X. Tackling the slump Open the taps, loosen the vice A sickly economy needs more monetary ease and a little less fiscal squeeze. The National Trust Power in the land Forget the trade unions: Energy policy What the frack? Health reform Honey, we shrunk the hospitals The next big row about the NHS. Designer drugs High society How recreational drug use—and the problems it causes—are changing. Next in International X. Who should run the internet? A plaything of powerful nations Internet governance is under attack; it may have to mend its ways to survive. The changing adult business At a XXX-roads The adult industry is seeking respectability—and profits. Next in Business X. Aviation Flight to the future Modernising creaking air-traffic systems will be a huge task. The fashion industry The glossy posse Catwalks in the West, action in the East. Plus-sized clothing Big business Flogging fashion for the fuller figure. A market for social-media data Sipping from the fire hose Making sense of a torrent of tweets. Alcohol in Africa Keep on walking Persuading Africans to switch from beer to Scotch. But digging it up is a dirty, dangerous business. Schumpeter The trouble with superheroes HP has appointed yet another superstar boss from outside. Next in Finance and economics X. Emerging markets One more such victory The emerging economies are winning the currency war. Financial stability in South Korea The won that got away Things are not as bad as the currency markets indicate. European banks Holey grail How much capital do lenders need? Buttonwood Mood swings Financial markets are displaying a split personality. Investment and lobbying Money and politics Ask what your country can do for you. Tobin taxes and audit reform The blizzard from Brussels The European Commission gets busy. Economics focus Tinker, tailor Economists reconsider the merits of industrial policy, but some flaws are hard to fix. Next in Science and technology X. The future of physics 2 Stretching the perimeter Physics cannot subsist on experiments alone. Citizen astronomy A new world in your bedroom Amateur astronomers join the ranks of the planet hunters. Psychology All power tends to corrupt But power without status corrupts absolutely. Next in Books and arts X. The life of Charles Dickens Beloved bully Two welcome new biographies of Charles Dickens whose birth years ago will be celebrated next The Obama White House A cantankerous crew. New thriller Death and the machine. Fighting al-Qaeda Talking to terrorists. Contemporary art Weird alleyways of culture A show in London by Grayson Perry, potter-extraordinary. Next in Obituary X. Tiger Pataudi King of Indian cricket Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi, last Nawab of Pataudi and captain of India, died on September 22nd, aged Next in Economic and financial indicators X. Output, prices and jobs. The Economist commodity-price index. Trade, exchange rates, budget balances and interest rates. From the print edition Oct 1st Facebook Twitter Linked in Google plus Tumblr Instagram YouTube RSS Newsletters. Junichiro Tanizaki, chronicler of change Prospero June 15th, Markets are losing faith in Donald Trump Graphic detail June 15th, Retail sales, producer prices, wages and exchange rates Markets and data June 15th, Foreign reserves Markets and data June 15th, The shooting of Steve Scalise has a horribly familiar feel 3 The Economist explains: Why America still executes people 4 Speaker of the pack: Michel Barnier is impatient for Britain to get its Brexit points in order 5 Lordy: Blogs Bagehot's notebook Buttonwood's notebook Democracy in America Erasmus Free exchange Game theory Graphic detail Gulliver Prospero The Economist explains. Research and insights Topics Economics A-Z Style guide The World in Which MBA? Contact us Help About us Advertise with us Editorial Staff Staff Books Careers Site index. Modern Slavery Statement Accessibility Privacy policy Cookies info Terms of use.
What Is Diversification of Business Strategies, Definition & Examples Video & Lesson Transcript
What Is Diversification of Business Strategies, Definition & Examples Video & Lesson Transcript
3 thoughts on “Understanding samsungs diversification strategy”
Master Teacher Contract Teacher Retirement Employee Access Smart Ben Educator Licensing Technology Training Session Resources InformationNOW Tutorials ISTA IN DOE Outlook Remote Access Concord Tracker W.O.s.
Its performance overhead averages 73%, with a 2x-4x memory overhead.
Rites of Public worship - Communion and Synagogue and Rites of Passage - Jewish and Christian marriage.